In his parallel universe “Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain” Founder and Executive Director Husain Abdulla staunchly claims that he “leads the organization’s efforts to ensure that US policies support the democracy and human rights movement in Bahrain”, while ADHRB as an organization state that they have a policy of “engaging with key ACTORS”. So how, given such pious statements, do ADHRB and their officials justify denial of entry, to three recently democratically elected MP’s from Bahrain, to an ADHRB workshop being held inside the UN head quarters at Geneva, during the 28th regular session of the Human Rights Council. Was this action justifiable, and since it happened with in the hallowed halls, the Head Quarter for Human Rights, the United Nations, was the block consistent with both UN and/or US policy on freedom of speech and OF engaging with Key actors; stakeholders.
Yes it was, provided that is you take a pragmatic view for the definition of ACTOR as per the Oxford dictionary, a performer, player, trouper, theatrical, or better still a dramatic artist; whilst this might be consistent with the skill set required for self serving, self appointed “Americans for Democracy, the organizers of the workshop. One has to certainly agree, it is not consistent with that applicable to newly democratically elected MP’s. They are not actors after all; they are only the chosen representatives of the people.
I am all for consistency and transparency and would hate to call Husain Abdulla a hypocrite but it has to be said in his defense that, his action in barring the three MP’s with the assistance of security guards at the UN was in fact totally consistent with his own profile as stated on the ADHRB web page. He only claims to work with “key actors within the US government” and with “members of the Bahraini-American community”. Nowhere does he state or claim to work or engage with people, elected representatives or others that are actually from Bahrain.
No sir, Husain Abdulla is no hypocrite; I reserve that title for the ex-POMED, UN staffers who wallow in the ranks of ADHRB. Having been part of the clandestine activities that were hidden from direct public scrutiny under the “The Middle East Partnership Initiative” (MEPI) or alternatively “using dissidents to undermine and destabilize the countries of the Middle East to bring about Regime change”. These ex POMED people continue with that policy against Bahrain and lately Saudi from behind the facade of a single dissident and the grandiose labeling of ADHRB, warping their work for legitimacy, shrewdly in the vocabulary of democratic gobbledygook for western and “UN World” consumption. The UN workshop was not about picking holes in the bazaar language they use in articles supposedly written by Husain Abdulla but obviously written by American staffers, too many oops - calling a Saudi Palace in the desert a“Ranch”, very Ronald Ragan. It was not even about them giving readers a headache by swallowing a thesaurus and generating “cognitive dissonance”. No Sir, it was not about such trivial matters, it was about the situation here in Bahrain, the home country of the barred elected MP’s.
I for one would like to know where they were when their front man ran amuck inside the UN and denied entry to our Bahrain MP’s, to this publicly announced meeting. Did they intervene or apologize to the MP’s, try to explain. No sir, I believe they did not. Can we assume therefore that they sanctioned, in fact blessed this outrageous behavior. What sort of message do they believe this will send to others? That it is OK to tarnish the name of freedom of speech, dialogue, mutual respect and all other much-heralded institutions of Human Rights and democracy, in defense of American sensitivity provided that is, you are within the confines of the UN “Old Boys” comfort zone?
During the 2014 general election in Bahrain a large valid majority voted despite a boycott by theocrats, threats of violence and intimidation; America, the UN one would have thought, would be the first to welcome into their procedures, stakeholders democratically elected MP’s from Bahrain. It does therefore smack of deceit - a clear case that in recognizing these elected officials, would in itself be a contradiction to the draconian theme the MEPI have over the years invested so much time, energy and money in culturing for descriptive reporting on Bahrain.
Khalid Al Shaer, Nasser Al Qaseer, and Ali Al Muqla the three MP's SNUBBED surely deserve an apology from ADHRB likewise from the UN in Geneva. By their failure to act “Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain” have finally exposed themselves for what they are, apologists for the MEPI initiative, but also ADHRB must provide an answer to a wider question, one being asked by the people of Bahrain. Why did ADHRB share the platform with “BIRD” and “BCHR”, two dissident groups well known here for their sectarian agenda and then in a similar manner to CAGE in the UK, of being apologists for terrorist groups namely Feb 14 - Hezbollah Bahrain
“U.S. State Dept. Document Confirms Regime Change Agenda in Middle East”,
based on just-released U.S. State Department documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
The Middle East Partnership Initiative
MEPI initiatives are described as being administered from Washington and actioned by the Deputy Chief of Mission at U.S. embassies, as not coordinated with host governments but rather in support of “Civil Society” (any mention of which parts, their allegiance or accountability noticeably lacking) through “NGO Implementers” based in the United States. By “Implementers” we can assume this is an euphemism for the American equivalent of the British "QUANGO’s", best explained as propagating organizations with plenty of clout and of money. A pick and mix selection of credible globalists, warmongers and mouthpieces with open access to world bodies, national governments and the western media. Their agent provocateurs, the MEPI nominees from civil society often specially identified and recruited, dissident professionals, disenchanted opposition politicians, doctors, lawyers, and journalists along with unimaginatively labeled Activists, and Human Rights defenders.
Institutions part of/or supporting the MEPI program;
Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain, Human Rights Watch, National Democratic Institute, the National Endowment for Democracy, Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED), Council on Foreign Relations, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, American Enterprise Institute, Freedom House, RAND Corporation, The Brookings Institution, Physicians for Human Rights, Human Rights First, Amnesty International, Reporters Without Borders, Just Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Initiative, Center for American Progress, Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Hudson Institute, Peace Action West, Alliance for Peace building, New America Foundation, German Marshall Fund, Transparency International, International Republican Institute, Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice, International Women's Media Foundation -by no means complete so if I missed anybody I apologize.
#ADHRB PRINCIPLE OFFICERS Head BahrainI Dissent Husain Abdulla, Rachel B. Peterson; Dir of Communications Ex POMED, Michael B. Payne; Advocacy Associate Ex POMED.
Amnesty International and jihad A reputation at risk
US Middle East Foreign Policy; a cornucopia of Diplomatic Hogwash
The Trouble with Tom Malinowski
Amnesty International is US State Department Propaganda
Amnesty Int’l collapse: new head is former State Dept official who rationalized Iran sanctions, Gaza onslaught
Hubbly bubbly, spoil and trouble – Tom Malinowski stirs the pot
Poor leadership at key diplomatic post in Bahrain, State Department watchdog warns